
I have been thoroughly impressed with Europe’s intentions to place strict regulations on genetically modified foods, including outlawing genetically modified produce in general. Sadly, an article I recently read from the London Independent lead me to research the upsurge in secret GM crop trials in Europe & U.S.
This article stated that the government of the U.K. has been formulating plans for the “secret growth of genetically-modified crops” in “secure government sites,” such as military research compounds, science parks, or other covert areas. In this sense, the projects will be conducted away from the scrutiny of environmental groups or the public eye in general.
The U.K. government has stated that they will consider re-opening the public debate on genetically modified foods as an option for “global food shortages and rising prices.”
Clearly, this is a huge step backwards for global health. The ministry is even considering changing the laws to protect this research by changing current rules that make it illegal to conduct GM trials in private. In this sense, the public would be completely unaware of governmental technologies that alter the natural biology of what we eat. Leeds University, one of the sites where the GM research will be taking place, has asked the government to foot the £100,000 bill for guards, security fences and cameras, to prevent the public from protesting trials.
Suppressed Study Links Cancer to GM Foods
Similarly, evidence linking cancer in rats to genetically modified potatoes have sparked new criticism from activists in Britain.

These findings came from Russian scientist, Arpad Pusztai and the Institute of Nutrition of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences and were only recently released after a shocking eight-year court battle with biotech companies. The findings from the Russian scientist showed a clear and undeniable link between rats that ate the potatoes and tumors, cell damage in the stomach and intestines of the rats, and other “considerable damage to the rats’ organs.”
Luckily, due to this disclosure, the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs in the UK has attempted to halt new GM potato trials.
While the E.U. may be backtracking, at least the European Union has created laws for transparency in regard to the on-goings of bio-tech companies in the past.
In the U.S., where 60 to 70% of processed foods are genetically modified, the Federal Government has determined that producers of these foods do not have to inform customers as to whether foods are GM or not. And, as U.S. GM crop fields reached a whopping 135 million acres in 2006, you can bet that there is a high likelihood that you are ingesting these unsafe foods.
Similarly, the European Union, once heavily apposed to genetically modified foods, has backtracked in their forward thinking to look into using genetically modified crops as a solution to increased costs of food. Perhaps the most alarming statement on genetically modified foods comes from the research dean of the University of Leeds Faculty of Biological Science, stating that:
My Thoughts on Genetically Modified Foods

All of this brings me to highlight how our current governments seem to always revert back to the old way of dealing with new problems. To think that we can solve the global food, climate and economic crises by increasing our use of bio-chemically and bio-technology altered food substances is appalling.
We do not know all of the ill-effects of altering the genetic code of food, but initial research has shown, over and over, that even short-term reactions can be severe. Studies that have shown the detrimental effects of genetically modified foods have been quietly repressed.
The FDA suppressed a study describing lesions in the stomachs of mice that had eaten the Flavr Savr® GM tomatoes, stating that “Seven out of forty rats tested died within two weeks for unstated reasons.” [1]
From studies on genetically-modified Brazil nuts inducing allergies and anaphylactic shock, to potatoes causing cancer, the truth is that we do have a reason to fear these foods. Please write to your local, state and federal government officials demanding the elimination of GM foods and the requirement that all GM foods be labeled.
NOTE: Organically certified food is not genetically modified. For this and many other reasons I recommend eating raw organic foods especially fruit.













April 23rd, 2009 at 5:34 am
I have to agree with you Chris. Mother Nature knows best.
[Reply to this comment]
April 21st, 2009 at 4:48 am
Hi…
I agree our food should not be tampered with or experimented Food should be sacred it is the bastion we have left, just let it be the way Nature intended. Your bring up some great points that I think people should be aware of. It is important to stay up to date and aware of what is going on around you. Looking forward to more of your work.This is truly a scary development in the global food production.
[Reply to this comment]
April 15th, 2009 at 3:09 pm
Great blog post. Your bring up some great points that I think people should be aware of. It is important to stay up to date and aware of what is going on around you. Looking forward to more of your work.
[Reply to this comment]
April 14th, 2009 at 2:01 pm
This is truly a scary development in the global food production. I consider the UK and other dissenters to this mass experiment with our food supply to be an example of sanity in a world that is often fascinated with technological advancement at the expense of ethical considerations and good old common sense. What is more precious to us than what we eat? It is one of the few things with true, inherent value. If we adulterate our crops and then find that we can no longer safely eat what we grow, how do we undo the damage? How can we prevent the cross-contamination with other conventional crops, or even organic for that matter? Testing shows that we cannot.
[Reply to this comment]
chris replied on April 20th, 2009:
I agree our food should not be tampered with or experimented Food should be sacred it is the bastion we have left, just let it be the way Nature intended.
[Reply to this comment]
Chad replied on January 29th, 2010:
I think we should go further. Get rid of farming all together and go back to hunting and gathering, just the way Nature intended.
[Reply to this comment]