GLOBAL HEALING CENTER, INC. "Worldwide Leaders In Advanced Alternative Medicine" www.ghchealth.com / www.oxypowder.com Alternative Health & Healing Newsletter December 2002 Alternative Health & Healing Newsletter December, 2002 Dr. Group’s Quote of the Month: "Remember that inner peace and joy leads to outer peace and joy. When you feel at ease with yourself, everyone and everything around you will feel joy and relaxation." CONTENTS: Essay On Vaccine Injury, Homeland Security, and Culpability Growth Hormone No Fountain of Youth Do You "Catch" Disease or Do You Cause It? 10 Principles of Health Study Finds More Virulent Bacteria In US Poultry Pop Quiz On Food Smallpox Vaccine Results Are In Essay On Vaccine Injury, Homeland Security, and Culpability by Leonard G. Horowitz, D.M.D., M.A., M.P.H. If you are still processing shock in the wake of the virtually unanimous passage of the Bush administration's Homeland Security Bill with its "license to kill" from vaccine injuries without liabilities, you have likely yourself to blame most. I don't relish blaming victims, for we have all been victimized by this legislation. But for more than six years, since the publication of Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola-Nature, Accident or Intentional? (Tetrahedron Press, 1996) my colleagues and I tried to alert you to the increasing attacks on health freedoms and human rights directed by special interest groups representing the multi-national military-medical/pharmaceutical- petrochemical cartel. We provided proof of their power over most elected officials, and the mainstream media, but you thought we were delusional. We predicted unprecedented civil rights violations reflecting past history, international developments, unbridled corporate greed, and ongoing global genocide concomitant with totalitarian legislation. But you turned a deaf ear. We heralded the "Model State Emergency Health Powers Act" years before it was announced and even showed you documents and official testimonies concerning the "quarantine camps" being established, but you closed your eyes and said we were "paranoid". We explained Machiavellian theory in the common political practice of administering "managed chaos"-creating public frights for which expensive solutions had previously been prepared. As an example we solved the anthrax mailings mystery and identified its sole beneficiaries, particularly the British oligarchy-controlled anthrax vaccine maker, Bioport. We provided reams of data proving vaccines deliver biotoxic ingredients leaving recipients chronically ill and virtually enslaved to drug companies and their "life-saving" formulas. But you said this was "inconceivable," and asked "Don't you trust any vaccines?" So you took your children to "medical deities" for "routine childhood immunizations" because "they said it was mandatory," and you watched your children get sick, if not crippled. Then as you were wondering why you were so trusting, you sought other doctors to prescribe other drugs, made by the subsidiaries of the vaccine manufacturers. Soon after your child became ill you reached out to leaders in the "vaccine risk awareness" movement to report your grief and horror. They touched your hand, or told you they empathized. They asked that you send them money. Then they professed that most vaccines were "pretty safe." "Only some vaccines have problems that require our ongoing vigilance," they assured. They informed you to beware of those of people like me in the "anti-vaccination" camp. They labeled us "radicals" for our conviction that vaccines were principally made to deliver genocide. The effectively character assassinated our messengers rather than refuting the messages. You shook your head as if to say "how could the 'radicals' be so stupid." Then you gave these leaders and their organizations more money and your volunteered time in support of their outstanding efforts. One such leader and group comes to mind as an exquisite example. I adequately exposed the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) directed by Barbara Loe Fisher and Kathy Williams in previous writings. This leading "vaccine risk awareness" group's developmental history documents formidable formative financial and administrative ties to drug industrialists and pharmaceutical lobbyists. When my colleagues and I pointed this out to you, you silenced us and told us to "Stop it! We all need to work together." When I then relayed NVIC's large investment in sponsoring the passage of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which gave precedent to the Homeland Security Bill's drug industry indemnity clause, you still would not listened. The "superfund" that was set up for injured families through NVIC collusion with vaccine-makers' "was a good idea," you said somewhat unconvinced and unconvincing. The fact that the vast majority of the hundreds of thousands of vaccine-victimized families got nothing more than a bureaucratic shuffle and legal nightmare didn't alter your optimism toward these "political moderates." "They put out good information too, from time to time," you defended. Then I told you what the Bible says about half truths-"They are complete lies," I warned. "Unless you are willing to see and expose the 'big picture,' the whole truth, including the links between the vaccine makers and the Nazis of I.G. Farben and holocaust fame, you're misleading people, and your karma will be judged. 'As you sow, so shall you reap.'" In response you thought, There he goes again with his spiritual speak. Incredulously you asked, "You can't possibly believe that all vaccines are bad, do you? They eradicated illnesses didn't they?" I replied honestly and affirmatively, "No they didn't, hygiene and nutritional improvements did." But you could not accept my rationale. You heard me tell of my family's miraculous escape from the Nazis. "They lined millions of 'sheeple' up and marched them, with few protesting, to their early demise in the concentration camp gas chambers for allegedly 'showers'. Showers for what? 'Public health' and 'disinfection'," I recalled and continued. "Today's physicians' offices, hospitals, and public health units are much like the 'concentration camps' of yesteryear, and today's vaccines are the 'gas'. Don't you get the similarity?" You said it frightened you, and you preferred not to think about it again. You told me that although you "really respected" me for what I was doing, "calling the 'global beast' a 'global beast'," you felt a less politically disturbing option, a more moderate approach, was more appropriate, at least for you. I begged you to get in touch with the whole horrific truth. Not let fear or denial get in your way. I said the greatest risk to "homeland security" is civilian complacency as we are all being challenged by "white collar terrorists" directing political agendas and public health policies. "They use fear to command compliance with back-room shady dealings that put deadly agendas and profits before people while neglecting the scientific facts", I explained. A glimmer of light appeared for a moment in your eyes, but you blinked and it was gone. We finally agreed to disagree and you walked away. Now, with the passage of the Homeland Security Bill, the most egregious violation of the faith and trust we have placed in our governing officials-a direct physical and financial assault on the American people-maybe you will wake up. If you haven't already, please read "Disease Deities on Capitol Hill Address Autism" (Published in The Spirit of Health Newsletter, Fall-Winter 2002, also freely downloadable from www.healingcelebrations.com), and the complete written testimony I presented to the Government Reform Committee last April. You will see that I warned you about misplaced faith and trust in elected officials in Washington. I even warned our elected officials about this form of pork barrel politics, what amounts to mutual masturbation for financial gratification. If you had heeded my words, or read my works, you would not be in shock now, nor even mildly surprised by the grave injustice Congress perpetrated by passing this bill. You would understand why even Rep. Dan Burton (R-IN), who chairs the Government Reform Committee hearings into skyrocketing autism rates, voted for the bill. He told us he simply failed to read the last minute inclusions. What a good excuse. He said he knew nothing about the vaccine injury indemnity clause before voting to pass this act. And you still believe him? You believe him despite your knowledge that he, like many of us, reviewed the CDC-secreted scientific reports linking vaccines and mercury to brain damaged children. Hundreds of thousands of behaviorally impaired youth, Dan Burton bellowed from the dais, have resulted from the now widespread toxicity. Still, he argued, we need to give more money to the CDC to study the problem. Now that this horrific bill has passed, foreshadowing even more devastating impacts on the nation's health and civil rights, you lament your loss and the tragedy befalling the medicated masses of children with autism. You think of the time and energy you wasted in futile pursuit of class action lawsuits and legal claims against now fully indemnified vaccine makers. You question your own sanity in this political reality as you find yourself stuck between the rock of disappointment and the hard place of hopelessness. You lament the additional ramifications of this "license to kill" given to vaccine makers. It dawns on you that this trash legislation not only impacts the millions of young victims of mercury poisoning, but equally guarantees helplessness, if not hopelessness, for those struggling, now and in future years, with myriad cancers attributed to polio vaccine viral contaminations; for Gulf War Syndrome victims made ill by vaccines and drug interactions; for military personnel recently inoculated with anthrax vaccine with up to 85% made ill; for more than a hundred thousand Lyme vaccine injured people; for claimants who cite recent studies that will soon prove early hepatitis B vaccines triggered the international AIDS pandemic; and for the millions of forthcoming smallpox vaccine injured persons who you are told to accept as simply unfortunate casualties of America's new war. Finally, did you know that the opposition's effort to strip the bill of this disgusting provision fell short by only 5 votes. The final tally was 52-47. In my humble opinion, if you had spent the last six years researching the facts available to you, not pandering to deceitful politicians but confronting them, including self- proclaimed industry-financed "leaders" of the "vaccine risk awareness" movement, or playing political games/pussy-footing around the issues so as not to offend people with news of vaccination injuries as they reflect well orchestrated global genocide, you might have been able to persuade enough people in your sphere of influence to effectively pressure one more politician each year for six years to stand against this Bill. But, instead, you preferred to live in denial about the "big political picture" that includes genocide. With your justifications and rationalizations you get to be right in perceiving me as "radical", if not "insane". Now congress has passed the Homeland Security Bill, and you remain numbed by the weight of your personal contribution to this premeditated and exposed conspiratorial outcome. Is there any comfort now in your tormented reflection on how you once called me a "foolish conspiracy theorist"? You have now no one more than yourself to blame. "I'm an accountant by trade and figures don't lie, but liars can figure. The CDC/NAAR study did not do the clinical science such as immune blood panel tests, biopsies, etc. Taking numbers and coming to your conclusion that there is no connection to autism and the MMR vaccine is not science. Also the National Alliance for Autism Research (NAAR) who funded your study is funded by Merck, maker of the MMR vaccine. The CDC promotes and regulates vaccines at the same time..... this is a contradiction. The CDC therefore is only interested in furthering the agenda of the vaccine companies over the health and well-being of the families and their children." - Raymond Gallup, Founder Autism Autoimmunity Project, http://www.autismautoimmunityproject.org/ Growth Hormone No Fountain of Youth Growth hormone is advertised by many anti-aging clinics as a miracle "cure" for aging. However, a recent study found that the benefits of growth hormone are limited and taking the drug may pose serious health risks. Human growth hormone (HGH), which is naturally produced in the brain by the pituitary gland, is most plentiful in our bodies during adolescence and then declines with age. A synthetic version of HGH has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in children with difficulty growing and in adults to treat conditions such as severe growth hormone deficiency and to reverse muscle wasting associated with AIDS. It is estimated that tens of thousands of Americans take growth hormone for its possible anti-aging effects despite ongoing debate on the issue. The recent 26-week study followed 131 people between the ages of 65 and 88 years. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups, each of which received a different combination of growth hormone, sex steroid (testosterone for men, hormone replacement therapy for women), placebo growth hormone, and/or placebo sex steroid. At the end of the study, both men and women who were given growth hormone gained muscle and shed fat, though amounts were limited. Women gained about 2 to 5 pounds of muscle and lost about 5 pounds of fat, while men gained about 7 to 10 pounds of muscle and lost a similar amount of fat. However, only one group -- men who received growth hormone and testosterone -- showed actual functional improvements in endurance and strength. The cardiovascular endurance of men in this group increased eight percent and muscle strength increased seven percent. While findings suggest that growth hormone may play some role in fighting aging, small improvements in strength and endurance may not make much of a difference in performing daily tasks. Additionally, during the study eighteen men taking growth hormone developed either diabetes or glucose intolerance, compared with seven men not taking growth hormone. Other side effects, which were most common in men, included swelling of the arms and legs, carpal tunnel syndrome, and joint. Growth hormone is also known to raise blood insulin levels, which may promote breast and prostate cancers. The study noted that there could be unknown side effects as well and pointed out that the elderly are more likely to react adversely to growth hormone than children. Additional studies are needed to fully determine the benefits and risks of growth hormone in aging people. JAMA November 13, 2002;288:2282-2292 Do you "catch" disease… or do you "cause" it? Most of the last century people saw disease as bad luck. You got what you got, and there was nothing you could do about it. You could blame your genes. You could blame whoever you "caught" it from. But you couldn’t do anything about it... really. All you could do was...go in for a 5 minute doctor’s visit and get a prescription. But there have been a few medical doctors who have never really believed in the "blame game" or the bad luck theory. They have proven in their research and medical practice that... you don’t "catch" disease, you "cause" it. And the good news is, whatever you "cause" can often be "uncaused" or at least prevented. You can do something about your health instead of blaming your genes or other people. Until recently these doctors have largely been ignored, but people are tired of being sick and feeling like they have no choice in the matter. They are starting to turn to prevention and recognize that they don’t have to be a statistic. Diabetes may be up 30% in only 8 years, especially among the young. Obesity may be an epidemic. But they don’t have to participate. They want to believe doctors like Mitchell Gaynor, head of oncology at the Strang Cancer Prevention Center who teaches that... 93% of all diseases can be prevented with simple lifestyle changes… in food, exercise, and relationships. 10 Principles of Health Ted H Spence, DDS, NMD 1. Drink plenty of water. Water is crucial to good health because it is a basic need for every cell. Detoxification, waste elimination and metabolism cannot take place without adequate water. Water should be distilled or purified and not contain chemicals like chlorine and fluoride. Many bottled waters contain fluoride and some are high in minerals. We need to drink at least 8-10 glasses of water a day or ½ our body weight in ounces. Water is the elixir of life. 2. Get adequate exercise. Physical activity does more than just stretch and tone the muscles; it actually provides for cellular nourishment and enhances cellular waste elimination. We know that bodily movements help to circulate the lymphatic system and that improves our immunity by getting the lymphocytes circulating. The lymph channels also carry fats throughout the body. Movement tones muscles and generates heat and circulation. Physical exercise improves appetite and allows for nourishing the cells. Walking, biking, jogging, swimming, hiking or mowing the lawn gets us out doors in the fresh air and improves our health. 3. Get adequate rest...daily. Rest is something we should not avoid. During periods of sleep our body is designed to renew itself and eliminate toxins. Without the proper rest coming at the right time, our body cannot function optimally. Thyroid activity is increased at night for removal of wastes from the cells. The liver is active at night too, eliminating wastes. Rest is important to healthy; do not neglect it. 4. Get adequate sunshine. Today we hear a lot about the sun causing skin damage, even cancer. I for one do not feel that it is the sun as the cause, but a lack of healthy quality fats in the diet. High quality fats and the essential fatty acids give us good healthy skin, which is not subject to skin cancer…regardless of how much sun is received. The sun promotes health in many ways, one of which is in the production of vitamin D from the cholesterol in the skin. Vitamin D helps promote strong bones and teeth and helps in calcium metabolism. Sunshine is important to our health. 5. Get a good nutritious diet. Food is a key part of health, but that food must be wholesome, organic and fresh. Refined, processed and chemicalized foods are not health promoting, nor life sustaining. While they may provide some nutrition, they do so at the cost of our long-term health. Good wholesome foods provide for good immune function and give us energy to exercise and detoxify wastes. Variety is important for good health, because not one food contains all the essential nutrients. Good nutrition means eating a natural wholesome diet. To some it may mean taking vitamins, minerals or herbs, which is all right as long as they are natural. Chemical vitamins are not health promoting and actually cause damage by depleting valuable enzymes. Of course, the best nutritious diet in the world will not help anyone if they cannot digest it, so digestion is important too. 6. Avoid stress. Stress is something that we all have to deal with, but should be minimized. Stress is basically how we deal with the world around us and can take us down fast. Stress is like a "Boa Constrictor" because it constricts and prevents blood flow to different organs. Stress is specific to each person and must be dealt with individually. What is stress to one person may be fun to another person. I like to include spiritual growth in this principle, because it is a well-known fact that belief in God is one way to avoid worldly stress. 7. Get fresh air daily. Fresh air is not something we should take for granted. Breathing cleanses the lung and normalizes many bodily functions. Oxygen is the basic unit for all cellular metabolism. The carbon dioxide from the lungs actually controls body acidity by regulating the carbonic acid production. Exercising out doors gives us fresh air, provided we avoid polluted areas and heavy smog. Yoga breathing exercises are also very helpful for cleansing the lungs and getting oxygen to the cells. 8. Cleanliness. Now I know there are many other principles we can think of for better health, but cleanliness is important. Good sanitation and bodily hygiene goes a long way to improving health and well-being. Bathing aids health by cleansing toxins from the skin. We should include tooth brushing too, since the mouth is a portal of entry for many microbes. Many historians agree that epidemics, like the Bubonic Plague, occurred during a time when bathing was very unpopular and that is something to think about. Was it soap or vaccines that eliminated disease? 9. Spiritual Growth. Spiritual growth or our walk with our Creator is so important to health. Prayer can guide us into the path of health and lead us out of the valley of temptation for sweets. I have personally witnessed many people being guided by prayer for better health. One lady had dropsy and changed her diet to reduce her problem after prayer. Prayer works. There are now many studies showing the power of prayer for healing, but we know this is really not the place for science. 10. Hope. Hope is one key to health that many people lack. Hope provides increased resistance to disease and actually boosts our immunity. Hope can be expressed as reduced stress and can result from prayer, beliefs, studies, thoughts, the comments of other people, friends, family, doctors, or anything that produces the belief that healing is obtainable. Even a simple handshake can produce hope. Prayer offers hope. The placebo effect is the result of hope of a cure. Even allopathic chemical drugs offer hope to many a person, who believes in them. Hope is something not tangible, but very complex and concrete to the individual. If the doctor says you will die in three weeks, people die in three weeks because of lost hope. There was a case in Japan where two blood reports got mixed. One person (who was healthy) was told they only had a few months to live and the other person (with cancer) was told they were healthy. Yet, the person who was told (by mistake) they would die died and the person with cancer remained alive beyond their deadline, because they were told they did not have cancer. False tests, mixed reports and errors can eliminate or give hope, depending on which side of the fence one is on. Belief in a cure is sometimes all that is required for a cure, while loss of hope is often terminal. Study finds more virulent bacteria in U.S. poultry Wednesday, December 11, 2002 By Randy Fabi, Reuters WASHINGTON — Americans sickened by chicken contaminated with salmonella and campylobacter may stay ill longer and pay more for treatment due to virulent strains of the bacteria that resist common antibiotics, Consumers Union said Tuesday. U.S. farmers have long used antibiotics to prevent contagious diseases in livestock grown for food and to increase growth. Consumers Union and other critics believe routinely feeding powerful antibiotics to livestock — along with overuse of the drugs in humans — is producing bacteria that are more difficult to treat. In a nationwide analysis of brand-name poultry, the nonprofit publisher of Consumer Reports magazine found 90 percent of the campylobacter found in the poultry was resistant to one or more commonly used antibiotics, including tetracycline and erythromycin. Of the chickens with salmonella, 34 percent were resistant to antibiotics. "Doctors may have to prescribe several antibiotics before finding one that works", said Doug Podolsky, senior editor of the magazine. "And patients may have to pay more to be treated." The findings, published in the Consumer Report's January issue, were part of a larger study on the prevalence of salmonella and campylobacter in chicken. The bugs, which infect more than 1.1 million Americans annually, can cause fever, diarrhea, and abdominal cramps. McDonald's Corp., Wendy's International Inc., Tyson Foods Inc., and closely held Perdue Inc. promised earlier this year that their poultry products would be free of certain antibiotics. NATIONWIDE STUDY Consumer Union said it analyzed 484 raw chickens purchased at supermarkets in two dozen U.S. cities. Of the chickens, 42 percent were contaminated with campylobacter and 12 percent with salmonella. Those rates of contamination were down significantly from the consumer group's last study in 1997 that found 63 percent of chickens tested had campylobacter and 16 percent had salmonella. Raw chicken included in the study were sold by Tyson, Perdue, Pilgrim's Pride Corp., and privately held Foster Farms. The National Chicken Council, which represents poultry farmers, said the decline in salmonella and campylobacter contamination showed the industry was taking the necessary steps against harmful bacteria. The trade group also said it was misleading to focus on antibiotics resistance. "Resistance to bacteria is by no means limited to raw poultry," said Richard Lobb, spokesman for the trade group. "You have to look at its long-term use in human health and its effect." Poultry farmers say a key source of antibiotic resistance comes from U.S. physicians being too quick to prescribe common antibiotics at the request of patients. CONGRESSIONAL ACTION NEEDED? U.S. health officials have cautioned that some infections were becoming more difficult to treat. "Unfortunately, some salmonella bacteria have become resistant to antibiotics, largely as a result of the use of antibiotics to promote the growth of feed animals," according to documents previously issued by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Consumers Union urged Congress to ban certain antibiotics in animals that are also regularly used for people. The Food and Drug Administration in September proposed stricter regulations mandating drug companies to submit information about resistance risk when applying for approval for new animal drugs. The European Union has had a long-standing ban on sales of four antibiotics for use in livestock feed. Other antibiotics are allowed, although some nations like Denmark and Sweden have called for a halt to prolonged use. Consumers Union also recommended that USDA begin testing at poultry plants for campylobacter. A USDA spokesman said the department was "laying the ground work" on testing for the bacteria but declined to elaborate. POP QUIZ ON FOOD By Jon Rappoport NOVEMBER 25. Here are some questions about the US food supply. Note down your answers. A failing grade will require extra-credit work to gain a pass. Note: These questions only cover a small portion of the available information about food in the US. Are Americans now eating irradiated food? Did Iowa Senator Tom Harkin insert a provision in the 2002 Senate Farm Bill that would change the labeling of irradiated beef from "treated by irradiation" to "pasteurized?" Is this wording deceptive? Does "irradiated beef" mean "treated with radiation" at a facility set up to "nuke" meat? At these facilities, is meat treated with cobalt pellets? Cobalt rods? X-rays? Electron beams? Is the allowed radiation dosage 200 million times higher than a chest X-ray? Do the changes provoked in meat by the radiation process include production of elevated levels of the carcinogen benzene? Also, other radiolytic products which can cause cancer? Can irradiated food cause genetic damage in humans, when the food is eaten? Can irradiating meat cause the production of chemicals called cyclobutanones, which bring about chromosomal damage to intestinal cells in humans? Is the FDA in charge of certifying irradiated food as safe? Is the FDA claiming that irradiated food is safe? Is the FDA relying on studies which its own Irradiated Food Committee claims are flawed? Does the USDA state that irradiating food results in a heavy loss of vitamins A, C, E, and B-complex in that food? Does the USDA support irradiated food? Does the USDA favor giving food-processing companies control over the policing of radiation levels in irradiated food? Does the Dept. of Energy support irradiated food, because already-used nuclear fuel, in both the civilian and military sectors, can be utilized in food-irradiation facilities, instead of being disposed of by costly means? Are food irradiation facilities badly-guarded invitations to terrorism? Could the cobalt pellets in these facilities be stolen and used to produce dirty nuke bombs? Are most people unaware of the study, "Preventing Pathogenic Food Poisoning: Sanitation, Not Irradiation?" [International Journal of Health Services, v.31 (1):181-192, 2001] Are food-drug-chemical companies now cultivating genetically-modified (GM) experimental crops which produce pharmaceuticals and industrial chemicals? Are these experimental fields out in the open air? Has the US food supply just been contaminated by an experimental maize crop grown by the company Prodigene? Did that crop contain a drug or industrial chemical? Did that crop "infect" commercial food crops grown in Iowa and Nebraska? Are those commercial crops soy beans? Did the USDA quarantine 500,000 tonnes of soy at a Nebraska grain elevator, after finding that this huge amount of beans was contaminated with Prodigene’s experimental maize crop? Did the USDA then order that the soy tonnage be destroyed? Does the USDA know exactly what chemical was produced by the Prodigene GM maize crop? Is the USDA refusing to announce what that chemical or drug is? Does Prodigene---only one of the companies interested in GM "chemical-insertion"—maintain at least 96 locations in the US where these GM crops are grown? Does the USDA admit that a similar Prodigene incident occurred last year in the US? After looking into the work of Prodigene, is it possible that the company is inserting, into its experimental maize, AIDS vaccine gp120? Aprotinin, a blood clotting agent? Trypsin, a digestive enzyme also used in leather tanning and involved in the production of insulin? Laccase, an industrial adhesive? Are there reports that Prodigene is also inserting into its GM crops an experimental hepatitis B vaccine? A pig-disease vaccine for porcine gastroenteritis? Do genes inserted into food crops drift into other crops and plants? Is the Pope Catholic? Does a bear defecate in the woods? Please turn in your test papers. ANSWERS TO ALL QUESTIONS ABOVE: YES. Extra-credit questions: Do widely used organophosphates (sprayed on food crops) pose a significant health risk? Does the US government refuse to make a clear statement that organically-grown foods are healthier than food crops grown with chemicals? Has Monsanto, one of the largest GM-food producers, been aware for some time---despite its public statements---that genes inserted into food crops drift into other plants? Was Martin Luther a Protestant? Turn in your answers. ANSWERS TO EXTRA-CREDIT QUESTIONS: ALL YES. SMALLPOX VACCINE RESULTS ARE IN By Jon Rappoport Monday, December 09, 2002 DECEMBER 9. The first returns are in on the smallpox vaccine. A recent multi-center US government clinical trial on 200 "young adults" has been completed. MSNBC reports. The volunteers who got the shot were VERY healthy to begin with. One researcher, Kathy Edwards, called them the "crème de la crème." Okay? So get this. "Yet when she [Edwards] inoculated them with smallpox vaccine, arms swelled, temperatures spiked and panic spread [at Baylor University]. It was the same at clinics in Iowa, Tennessee, and California." Stats: After the shot, one-third of the volunteers missed at least a day of work or school. 75 out of 200 experienced high fever. "Several were put on antibiotics because physicians worried that their blisters signaled a bacterial infection." Wow. And look, smallpox is a VIRUS, and antibiotics DON'T WORK against viruses. So, in essence, the researchers were inferring that the vaccine SUPPRESSED THE IMMUNE SYSTEMS of the volunteers---thus allowing bacterial infections to bloom suddenly---OR the vaccine was contaminated with bacteria to begin with. Researcher Edwards, who headed up the study, said, "I can read all day about it [the adverse effects of the vaccine], but seeing it is quite impressive. The reactions we saw were really quite remarkable." When a researcher makes a comment like this, you know some very bad things are happening. AND THIS WAS A POPULATION OF EXTREMELY HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS. YOUNG ADULTS WHO SHOULD BE AT THE VERY PEAK OF LIFE, WITH THEIR IMMUNE DEFENSES FULLY INTACT. Of course, this story didn't get much play in the press. But the handwriting is on the wall. Anyone can see what'll happen if they start shooting up people by the millions with the vaccine. For example, people who don't qualify as severely immune suppressed by any obvious assessment, but still do, in fact, have reduced immune capacity---AND THAT IS A WHOLE LOT OF PEOPLE.---these folks will be AT GREAT RISK from the vaccine. This government study is KEY. Because later on, they will try to cover up the devastating effects of the vaccine. They will lie, distort, omit. But right now, here it is. Out in the open. The results, for all to see. Let me tell you something. The CDC WANTED to release the results of this study. They wanted to go on the record now, before the stuff really hits the fan. They are very frightened of being nailed for killing people with the vaccine. Wishing you the Blessings of a Merry Christmas And a Happy, Healthy and Prosperous New Year! Global Healing Center, Inc. Dr. Edward F. Group Dr. Loretta Lanphier If you would like to have Dr. Group speak at your church, organization or civic group or know of an organization that would benefit from this seminar, please contact us at 713.476.0016 PLEASE PASS THIS NEWSLETTER ON TO OTHER POTENTIAL SUBSCRIBERS. "He who does not use his endeavors to heal himself is a brother to him who commits suicide." Proverbs 18:9 (Amplified)